Only use the washer/dryer/dishwasher when you have full loads, not partial
John McCain: Ten More Years in Iraq!
On May 13, 2007, Tim Russert interviewed Senator John McCain, Republican presidential candidate. The transcript is provided below along with my comments in bold (a/k/a my bold comments):
 MSNBC.com |
MTP Transcript for May 13, 2007
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) discusses his 2008 presidential bid
Updated: 12:50 p.m. ET May 13, 2007
MR. TIM RUSSERT: Our issues this Sunday: Our Meet the Candidates 2008 series continues, an exclusive interview with Republican John McCain. He represented Arizona in the U.S. House for four years, for the past twenty years in the U.S. Senate where he now serves as the ranking member on the Armed Services Committee. He ran unsuccessfully for the Republican nomination for president in 2000. This morning John McCain joins us for the full hour on MEET THE PRESS.
Senator McCain, welcome back to MEET THE PRESS.
SEN. JOHN McCAIN (R-AZ): You didn’t have to say unsuccessful; everybody knows that.
MR. RUSSERT: Well, all part of the history. Let’s go right to it–Iraq.
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: We’ve been talking to voters across the country, our NBC/Wall Street Journal poll: Is victory in Iraq still possible? Thirty-six percent say victory’s possible; 55 percent say victory not possible. And look at this, senator. Was the war–was the war–was it a mistake to send troops? Fifty- eight percent say yes, a mistake; 40 percent say no. Are you surprised at those numbers?
SEN. McCAIN: Not too. Particularly on the issue of the second question, when we have experienced the enormous difficulties and sacrifice that have been part of this conflict that, certainly, you can understand that. Americans are frustrated, and they’re saddened our failures in this conflict. My point is, and I’m sure we’ll get into it, and that is we have a chance of success, and I don’t think that a lot of Americans are as fully aware as they should be of the consequences of failure in Iraq.
Underestimating Americans’ ability to understand the issues is a time-honored “Father-Knows-Best” tradition among Republicans. We know the consequences of failure. We also know the consequences of perpetuating failure.
MR. RUSSERT: When you were speaking in 2005, the American Enterprise Institute, you said this…
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: “If we can’t retain the support of the American people, we will have lost this war as soundly as if our forces were defeated on the battlefield.” Haven’t they lost the support of the American people?
SEN. McCAIN: I think if we can show the American people some successes in Iraq and continue and expand on some of the successes we’ve already experienced in Anbar province and some neighborhoods in Baghdad, that I think Americans would–and if we do a better job, and that’s people like me, of explaining the consequences of failure.
The consequences of failure, Tim, are that there would be chaos in the region.
And there isn’t chaos now?!
There’s three–two million Sunni in Baghdad. The Iranians would continue to increase their influence, the Saudis would have to help the Sunni, the Kurds would want independence, the Turks will never stand for it. Some people say partition. You’d have to partition bedrooms in Baghdad because Sunni and Shia are, are married.
Republicans fixate on getting into people’s bedrooms. Whatever happened to laissez faire? As far as I’m concerned, whatever works for a marriage (as long as it doesn’t involve children or animals) is okay. I think I even saw this “partitioning” fetish on a Benny Hill rerun. Maybe, that’s where McCain got the idea!
This, this is a very, very difficult situation, but the consequences of failure, in my view, are unlike the Vietnam war where we could leave and come home and it was over, that these people will try to follow us home and the region will erupt to a point where we may have to come back or we will be compating– combating what is now, to a large degree, al-Qaeda, although certainly other–many other factors of sectarian violence, in the region.
MR. RUSSERT: In hindsight, was it a good idea to go into Iraq?
SEN. McCAIN: You know, in hindsight, if we had exploited the initial success, which was shock and awe, and we succeeded, and we had done the right things after that, all of us would be applauding what we did.
Not all of us. There are still those of us who don’t believe in pre-emptive strikes. There are still those of us who remember we were assured of an imminent threat of weapons of mass destruction. There are still those of us who don’t believe democracies should sacrifice the lives of Iraqi people and American soldiers for control of oil.
We didn’t. It was terribly mismanaged. It was–I went over there very shortly after the initial victory and came back convinced that we didn’t have enough troops on the ground, we were making the wrong decisions, and that Secretary Rumsfeld was badly mismanaging the conflict. And I spoke about it and complained for years.
This is what happens when you have rubber-stampers in Congress. McCain was one of them, despite his claimed “protests.”
So, if we had succeeded and done the right thing after the initial military success, then all of us would be very happy that one of the most terrible, cruel dictators in history was removed from power. Now, because of our failures, obviously we have paid a very heavy price in American blood and treasure and a great sacrifice.
MR. RUSSERT: So it was a good idea to go in?
SEN. McCAIN: I think at the time, given the information we had. Every intelligence agency in the world, not just U.S., believed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Well, not exactly. Not even our own intelligence was that adamant about the “threat.” We also now know, thanks to the Downing Street Memo, that the Bush Administration was “fixing” the intelligence and the facts to fit his agenda — which was to go invade Iraq all along.
He had acquired and used them before. There was no doubt that he was going to acquire and use them if he could. The sanctions were breaking down. The Oil for Food scandal was in the billions of dollars. And, of course, at the time, given the information we had–hindsight is 20/20. If we’d have known we were going to experience the failures we experienced, obviously it would give us all pause. Yet the information and the knowledge and the situation at the time, I think that it was certainly justified.
MR. RUSSERT: The Pentagon’s Quarterly Report, the director of the CIA, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, all have said that sectarian violence is the problem. In fact, the–General Maples said that al-Qaeda accounts for only a small fraction of the insurgent violence.
SEN. McCAIN: You know the…
MR. RUSSERT: Who’s our enemy?
SEN. McCAIN: Well, first of all, General Petraeus, the general on the ground, does not agree with that. Al-Qaeda is exploiting these sectarian differences. They are trying to orchestrate attacks on both Sunni and Shia, but–in order to spark this and increase this sectarian violence that’s going on. Al-Qaeda is playing significantly. Now, are there problems with sectarian violence? Of course there is. Is there other problems, such as in Anbar Province where Sunnis are now combatting al-Qaeda? Are al-Qaeda being shoved out of Baghdad into areas outside of Baghdad? Yes. And are there problems in those areas?
Look, this is long and hard and difficult, and I’ve said it for a long time. And it’s no last throes, it’s no mission accomplished, it’s no few dead-enders. It’s long and hard and tough. We are experiencing some successes.
Namely, Republican successes:
2004 U.S. Presidential Election;
Controlling Americans through fear, threat of another September 11;
Controlling oil production in the Middle East;
Creating profits for Haliburton and the rest of Bush’s “base”; Committing U.S. taxpayer money to Republican interests so that Republican’s can finish crippling Social Security, education, healthcare, and any and all other federally funded social programs — so that everything can be privatized (for the sake of corporate profits);
Ensure the success of corporations rather than of individuals;
Continue to spy on Americans, frisk Americans, ignore due process and undermine the Constitution under the guise of “promoting democracy” here and in the Middle East.
Do we have to experience more? Yes. But to do what the Democrats want to do, and that’s set a date for withdrawal, even those who opposed the war from the beginning don’t think that that would lead to anything but an enormously challenging situation as a result.
MR. RUSSERT: But, senator, the Iraqi parliament, a majority of the Iraqi parliament, has signed a petition asking for a date certain for withdrawal of American troops. If the Iraqi parliament wants it, a majority in the Congress want it…
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: …then why do you stand there and say, “No, you can’t have it”?
SEN. McCAIN: Because it’s my job to give my best estimate to the American people, no matter what the political calculations may be, as to what’s the best in our nation’s national security interest. Young men and women are risking their lives as we speak in, in, in Iraq. And I know that they will be in greater harm’s way if we withdraw from Iraq, as we keep debating over and over and over again. And I know what’s best, in my mind, in my experience, in my knowledge, in my inspiration, as to what’s best for this country. So political calculations such as polls, I understand that if the American people don’t continue to support this effort that we will be forced to withdraw. But it’s also my obligation to tell the American people and my constituents in Arizona that I represent, what the consequences of failure will be; and I believe they will be catastrophic.
What if you’re wrong, Senata? You were wrong before. Rather than proceeding with caution, you fully backed Bush after September 11; you didn’t ask for more proof before invading Iraq; you helped re-elect a president you know lied to the American people; and you’re now supporting the same Iraq policy you know is failing and doomed to fail. You think more troops will help and you have the audacity to call that “a new Iraq strategy.” Yes, by all means: the way to put out a fire is to pour more gasoline on it.
MR. RUSSERT: But the duly elected people’s bodies, the U.S. Congress and the Iraqi parliament, say they want a troop withdrawal. That’s more than a poll. Isn’t that the voice of the people?
SEN. McCAIN: Well, the–as far as the Iraqi parliament is concerned, the Iraqi government obviously doesn’t feel that way, their–the representatives in their government. Second of all, there is some, a certain amount of domestic political calculations involved there in what the Iraqi, quote, “parliament” said.
According to McCain, the duly elected governing body of Iraq is a “parliament”parliament. And in the same breath, he says he “respects” them (notice I put that in quotes). While we’re at it, let’s also recognize that what Republicans promote in America is a “democracy” in which torture is “banned”, but not really because Republicans swear to “uphold” the Constitution but do not believe that “due process” applies to “enemy combatants,” or that it is “illegal” to spy on Americans because everything they do is in the best interest of “national security.”
The Iraqi parliament has their ability to, to voice their views, and I respect them. And I, as I say, I–I’ll repeat again, I understand how democracies work. I saw it in Vietnam. I saw it in Vietnam. And I saw it in Vietnam, the predictions, that everything would be a worker’s paradise in, in Vietnam if we left.
Senator McCain almost seems to be suggesting that America would have succeeded in Vietnam if they’d stayed the course and kept fighting . . . and dying. As a Vietnam POW, Senator McCain suffered greatly for his country; but that hasn’t imbued him with a special wisdom or insight into war and foreign policy. If anything, it’s tainted his judgement. He fails to see that political calculations and American arrogance have again trapped the United States in a ill-conceived and terribly mismanaged life-threatening situation.
And thousands were executed and millions went to re-education camps. So I, I believe that, that the consequences of failure, and particularly sitting on the large reserves of oil they have,
Ah yes, the oil!
particularly considering the influence of al-Qaeda is concerned, you will see enormous destabilization in the region,
Which is exactly why Bush Senior didn’t take Saddam out of power during the Gulf War. All this because Dubya wanted to show up his Dad.
and that’s my duty. That’s my obligation. It’s not my privilege. And political calculations should not enter into any information or position that I take on, on a, on an issue of national security.
MR. RUSSERT: The Iraqi parliament says they want to take a two-month vacation while our men and women shed their blood.
I’m pretty sure they didn’t say that, but how nice of Russert to put it in terms that help Republicans scapegoat the “do-nothing” Iraqi government. In the meantime, our Congress keeps going out of session for summer vacations, Thanksgiving, and the elections despite all of our unfinished business. And Bush still finds time to vacation in Crawford and threaten the press with a bulldozer. I’ll tell you what, when our American politicians have to go to work every day wearing a flack jacket, I’ll say they’re entitled to their vacations.
SEN. McCAIN: I am, I am unalterably opposed to it. One of the real difficulties we face in this conflict, obviously, is whether the Maliki government will act as an inclusive government, and whether the Maliki government will do the things that are necessary to be done. And I’m very concerned about it. All of us are very concerned about it. This government has to pass the oil revenue sharing law. This government has to pass de-Baathification. They have to declare elections in the provinces so that Sunni, who now want to take part in the electoral process, can have their representatives.
MR. RUSSERT: They’ve had four years to do this.
SEN. McCAIN: They have had this time, and they have done some things. It took us about 100 and some years before we had a bloody civil war to decide the future of our country. This is a fledgling democracy. I’m not, I’m not making excuses for it, but they have not been in this business before.
Yes, Iraq is new to “democracy,” but not to the civil strife in that region which is older than America. And yet, these bozos in Washington D.C. think they can control centuries of conflict by putting American soldiers in harms way for “our national security.” Arrogance.
And yet that does not change the fact that, in my view, unless they act, it could jeopardize what is already in jeopardy.
MR. RUSSERT: Would you be in favor of a referendum amongst the Iraqi people to make a decision as to whether U.S. troops should stay or leave?
SEN. McCAIN: No, no more than I should–would have a referendum in the United States of America as to whether Iraqi troops should leave,
Yeah, timelines are for sissies. For example, American corporations never set timelines. They stay the course and make “open ended” investments because every U.S. dollar that’s put into a project will eventually double, and Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy really do exist and . . .
or whether we should be in or out of NATO, or any other issue. The Iraqi government is an elected government, and they are functioning. And so why we would need a, quote, “referendum” is no more necessary in this country as in that one. Does the Maliki government have to act more effectively, more inclusively? Absolutely they do, and it’s of great concern, and I think it’s one of the great vulnerabilities as we try to move forward and succeed there. Now, what’s success? Economic, political and social progress, which can only be obtained in an environment of security.
Yes, which is why the American Revolution and French Revolution were so successful, because both occurred only when peace and security prevailed. And why the U.S. government is currently spying on Americans and imprisoning people without due process — because again, clearly “democracy” is at its best in an environment of “security.”
Neighborhoods in Baghdad are safer. They’re not safe, but they are safer than they were before. And the government has to function more effectively, and then the Iraqi military and police take over those responsibilities as we gradually withdraw. That’s the recipe for success.
You’ve had four years! How gradual does it need to be, Senata?
MR. RUSSERT: The Iraqi army, over 120 battalions.
SEN. McCAIN: Yep.
MR. RUSSERT: There are only 10 battalions–10! That’s 6,000 soldiers…
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: …that are independently working separate and apart from Americans. How can it be, after four years, the Iraqis only have 6,000 soldiers operating independently?
Tim! Still helping Republicans scapegoat Iraqis? What’s their incentive, Dude? The American soldiers are there to pick up the slack!
SEN. McCAIN: Well, two things. One, because the war was so badly mismanaged. The–Secretary Rumsfeld claimed that there was, at one point, I believe, 175,000 trained, and they obviously fell apart.
Et tu, Brutus?
There’s a difference, though, between those who can, can perform, quote, “independently,” and those that can perform effectively alongside U.S. troops in Baghdad and around the country. There are–there are Iraqi units that still probably can’t stand up on their own, but they can operate effectively alongside U.S. military. The key to it is, will we be able to train more who can operate independently on their own? We have a ways to go. But we, again, with this new strategy–and it is a strategy, not a surge–we have been able to see significant improvement. Enough improvement? Probably not. But at least we’re seeing some progress. And our commanders on the ground are saying that the Iraqi military is functioning far more effectively, effective, and we are seeing progress there.
MR. RUSSERT: Jim Miklaszewski, our Pentagon correspondent, reports that he’s being told by senior military officials that, come April, we do not have the troops to continue to send to Iraq in the rotation that we’ve been–that’s been ongoing. We simply don’t have them.
SEN. McCAIN: Come next April.
MR. RUSSERT: That’s correct.
SEN. McCAIN: We are increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps. Another one of the great failings when we began this was not increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps. I’ve said for years that we need to dramatically increase them, particularly in certain specialties. I hope that the increased recruitment that we are experiencing now will give us an opportunity to increase those numbers. I also hope that we can see some signs of success in this challenge that we are facing.
Hey, me too, Buddy.
MR. RUSSERT: General Petraeus said this: “Any student of history recognizes there’s no military solution to a problem like that in Iraq, to the insurgency of Iraq.”
SEN. McCAIN: And, you know, I’ve had many conversations with General Petraeus and I don’t want to put words in his mouth, but he’ll also tell you that history shows us, any student of history will tell, you that in–if–unless you have an environment of security for the people to try to live normal lives, and the economic, politically–political and social environment is able to grow and flourish, then you are doomed to failure. So, when you say it’s all we–it’s all up to the Iraqis, that’s like saying a neighborhood that’s been taken over by gangs, it’s up to the people in the neighborhood.
That’s funny because the President acknowledged that communities are the front lines in the “War on Drugs” and gang-related violence when he signed the Drug Free Communities Act. Similarly, in May, 2006, the Department of Justice (that’s U.S. Attorney General Gonzales, et al.) acknowledged that fighting gang violence is a community-driven effort and works best through grassroots programs.
We have to do whatever we can to provide them with an environment in which they can exist and begin to lead normal lives. We are showing some success. The, the strategy before was, “Go kill people.” It was the old search-and-destroy. “Go kill people and go back to your base.” We’ve now got 53 or more outposts in Baghdad where Iraqi and American military are 24/7. There are some progress being made, and General Petraeus will say that, too. Enough? We’ll see.
MR. RUSSERT: It’s been more than four years.
SEN. McCAIN: I know.
MR. RUSSERT: And the American people are saying, “Why are we shedding our blood, and they’re taking vacations as a parliament?”
Actually, I’m not saying that at all. It’s a little late for Americans to complain about Iraqis. I agree with Will Smith: “Don’t start nothin’ — won’t be nothin’.” [Men In Black - a film about a different kind of illegal aliens]
They don’t have independent soldiers and battalions up and running. Our “National Intelligence Estimate” “outlines increasingly perilous situation in which the United States has little control” “strong possibility of further deterioration, according to sources familiar with the document.
“It couches glimmers of optimism in deep uncertainty about whether the Iraqi leaders will be able to transcend sectarian interests,” “fight against extremists, establish effective national institutions and end rampant corruption.”
That’s our own intelligence agency…
SEN. McCAIN: Yes.
MR. RUSSERT: …four years out.
SEN. McCAIN: Yes, and these same intelligence agencies gave us some very bad intelligence about four years ago, as well, as you might–as you might recall.
Well, I recall the Downing Street Memo that indicated Bush was intent on shaping intelligence to fit his agenda in Iraq; I recall that the 2003 minority in Congress, including Pelosi, voting against the war in Iraq and urging caution and cool heads and more proof; I recall the international community demanding that the U.S. give the U.N. inspectors a chance (just like now Bush, Cheney, McCain, Lieberman, et al. want us to give the war in Iraq “a chance” — except that Iraq could have been avoided if Bush & Co. had been patient in 2003); I recall a lot of chest-thumping on Capitol Hill and all the missed opportunities by members of Congress, including Senator McCain, to demand more accountability on the intelligence they received before authorizing a pre-emptive strike on a sovereign state.
But the fact, the fact is, this is long, hard difficult. And we talk about these present challenges that we face. We don’t talk a lot about what happens if we fail, and I think that that’s got to be part of any national discussion that we have. And the consequences of failure are chaos, genocide and, when you–when–and I’m sure you will ask this at some point, what’s plan B? My, my, my question to those who say, “Let’s set a date for withdrawal,” what’s your plan B?
International peace-keeping coalition led by the United Nations; talks with Syria and Iran; real diplomacy; instituting grassroots efforts in Iraq and the Middle East to strengthen Islamic moderates, rather than allowing Bush to continue to make the U.S. the “common enemy” to Islam, thereby helping Al Qaida and other Islamic fundamentalists in their recruiting efforts. Just a few ideas off the top of my head. You can run with it, McCain.
And the fact is, if we spent time on plan A, we, we, and give it a chance to succeed, I think would be a useful way of spending our time.
MR. RUSSERT: But under your plan, you’re strongly suggesting we’re going to be there for the next 10 years at least in order to secure and stabilize that country.
The Bush-Cheney-McCain-Lieberman, et al. Strategy: Ten More Years! And counting . . .
SEN. McCAIN: I am suggesting that we will have–hopefully reach a situation where American troops will not be on the front lines, where–and, by the way, that will not be immediately–where American troops are able to withdraw. We’ve had troops in South Korea for 60 years, and Americans are, are very satisfied with that situation.
And we’ve had troops in Germany for nearly 70 years; and in Guantanemo, well since 1898 actually. Apples and oranges, Senata! There’s a difference between a U.S. presence and an occupation.
The key to it is, is the Iraqi military and police taking over these responsibilities. And that is, I believe, the ultimate way we’re going to know whether we can reduce American casualties and they take over the responsibilities for, for governing their own country and militarily attacking and resisting al-Qaeda and other sectarian violence which will be there for a long, long time.
MR. RUSSERT: And we’re going to be there for a long time.
SEN. McCAIN: But if it is–if it is–if it is only in a role that is of support and American casualties are minimal, then I think it’s probably worth the investment.
“Probably worth the investment” — gotta love those corporate metaphors. And “Probably”? After admitting he’s willing to commit U.S. troops to another 10 years in Iraq, he’s not even sure it will be a success. Well, who could be, right?
If the level of casualties stays where it is and we do not have success, then we know that that will be a, a condition that we cannot stand for.
Well, I guess that’s the Republican exit strategy: 10 more years of killing and maiming U.S. troops and then it’s “a condition that we cannot stand for.” So they do have a deadline!
MR. RUSSERT: By when?
SEN. McCAIN: I don’t have a date. I think that the important thing is whether we assess as we move along.
Oh, sorry. Maybe 10 more years, maybe longer . . . My bad.
Everybody talks about–some people talk about April or May–August. Some people talk about September. The fact is that we’ve got to be showing progress along the way, and we will be–have plenty of time to assess that.
Look, Tim, I understand you, you are voicing the frustration that Americans feel. We’ve only got four of the five brigades over there now. We have just begun this new strategy. It is barely beginning, and I think it ought to be given a chance to succeed or fail.
Whenever you’re ready. Just say the word.
“Mission accomplished!”
No, silly, not those words.
And for us to, to go for two months of funding after we voted time and time again. The president, the president has vetoed, and we continue to, to try to micromanage this war,
A democracy doesn’t micromanage when the people get involved in demanding accountability and progress!
and, and if you want us out of there, then cut off the funding and bring them home tomorrow.
You would love that: decades of Republicans being able to falsely accuse Democrats of not supporting troops when in reality it’s the failed Iraq policy that’s not getting support. Nice little catch 22. You tricky Devils. But those Democrats on Capitol Hill are too self-interested to fall for that one.
MR. RUSSERT: Let me show you the kinds of things that are often said when soldiers are overseas, like this: “There’s no reason for the United States to remain. The American people want them home. I believe the majority of Congress wants them home. Our continued military presence allows another situation to rise, which could then lead to the wounding, killing or capture of American fighting men and women. We should do all in our power to avoid that. What should be the criteria is our immediate, orderly withdrawal. And if we do not do that and other Americans die then I” “say that the responsibilities for that lie with the Congress who did not exercise their authority under the Constitution. For us to get into nation-building, law and order, etc., I think, is a tragic and terrible mistake.”
I smell a set up.
You hear those kinds of words, right?
SEN. McCAIN: Sure I do. Americans are frustrated and saddened by the enormous sacrifice we’ve made and the gross mismanagement of the war. Now, my response to that statement is and what happens after we leave? Listen to all of the experts who will tell you that we can have a situation in the region which will, in, in the long run, entail far greater casualties, far greater dislocation, far greater threats to our national security than trying to give this an opportunity to succeed. That’s what the–my response to that heartfelt statement is.
MR. RUSSERT: Well, those are your words from 1993 about Somalia.
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
Wo-Ho! Nicely done Tim! Bet you stayed up all night thinking of that little strategy. Using McCain’s words against him! Way to go!
MR. RUSSERT: And that’s the kind of thing we’re hearing about Iraq.
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: You felt that way about Somalia when you saw no end in sight.
Thrust!
SEN. McCAIN: Yes, I did, and…
MR. RUSSERT: And many Americans now are echoing your words about Iraq, because they see no end in sight.
SEN. McCAIN: Well, if you compare–want to compare Somalia to what’s at stake in Iraq, please feel free to do so. I don’t see any comparison except that there was chaos in the streets of Mogadishu, and this now is got to do with vital national security interests.
Parry!
I also said that we should get out of Beirut when we did, because a, a presence of a few Marines in a barracks was not going to, in any way, significantly impact what was going on in Lebanon. And I was right, and a lot of young Marines died because we–of the way that we put a presence in there without any chance of success.
Envelopement. And that ends our fencing metaphors for the evening . . .
MR. RUSSERT: You say we’re making progress. You’ve been on this program talking about Iraq. In 2003…
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: …you said, “I believe we’ve achieved significant goals”; 2005, we view it as, as “hopeful,” we’re making “progress”; 2006, we’re on the “right track,” “I want to emphasize again” the “good things happening”; we’re “showing signs of success” in 2007. It’s upbeat, upbeat, upbeat.
SEN. McCAIN: I think…
MR. RUSSERT: And yet the reality is quite different than that kind of optimistic message.
SEN. McCAIN: You know, Tim, I think it would be fair also to put the statements that I made when I came back from Iraq that said it was a failed policy, that we had to have more troops on the ground, that we were not carrying out the right kind of effort at training and equipping the Iraqis, that the Iraqi government wasn’t–so it might be fair to flash some of those statements up, including the long speech I gave, after I came back from Iraq, to the Council on Foreign Relations, where I said if we pursue this failed policy, we will fail in Iraq. So I think that that might balance it out a bit. Do I think we had, we had made some progress? Yes. And do I think that we have had some significant setbacks? Yes. We– both is–are the case.
Good point, Senata! I completely agree that Russert and his peers should provide balanced reporting, not just slant their reports in the direction of the prevailing winds of public opinion. Balanced reporting is responsible, truly objective, and just plain right. Had they done that in 2003, public opinion might not have been so easily manipulated.
It’s a vicious cycle: the Administration embarks on realizing its personal objectives; the media joins the band wagon of flag wavers, giddy from a post-9/11 sense of identity; and Congress sets out to legislate in accordance with public opinion, which has of course been tainted through creative framing and selective reporting. And the rest of us looking on with 20/20 vision are left wringing our hands wondering when we became a totalitarian regime of nation builders, torturers, and civil rights violators.
You see my dilemma . . .
MR. RUSSERT: You made a lot of news back in April when you went to Iraq. You went on a radio show and said never–had a news conference, “never been able to go out in the city as I was today.” And then later these photographs were released, where we saw–(clears throat) excuse me–John McCain in the marketplace, surrounded, wearing a flack jacket. The next day the papers said that, “A day after members of an American congressional delegation led by Senator John McCain pointed to their brief visit” in “Baghdad’s central Market as evidence that the new security plan for the city was working, the merchants were incredulous about” “Americans’ conclusions. `What are they talking about?’” “the owner of an electrical supply shop said. `The security procedures were abnormal.’ The delegation arrived at the market” “more than 100 soldiers in armored humvees–the equivalent of an entire company,” “attack helicopters circled overhead, a senior” “military official in Baghdad said. The soldiers redirected traffic from the area” “restricted access to the American.” “The congressmen wore bulletproof vests” through the hour-long visit. `They paralyzed the market when they came,’” “`This was only for the media.’”
Oops.
SEN. McCAIN: Well, I don’t…
MR. RUSSERT: Wasn’t that…
SEN. McCAIN: …I don’t know who Mr. Faiyad is, and I’m sorry that I didn’t see him.
Yes, who is this mystery merchant McCain mentions out of the blue. Well, somebody briefed him on this merchant, because he knew his name by the time Russert got him to Meet the Press. You would think McCain would have a better answer by now.
I talked with many, many of the merchants. We stayed there for more, more than an hour. That same place was not a functioning market a short time before. A bomb had gone off in that area and killed many, many people. There, there was a group of people that I talked to, as I traveled–walked around that, that shopping area for over an hour who said, “I’m glad to see you. Things are better.” They–some–a guy came and complained about a sniper that,that they’d had problems with,
Maybe that was Maliki.
and the police chief we talked to about that.
My point is the neighborhoods are safer. They are not safe. That’s why we have to continue what we’re doing. We have a new strategy that,
Yes, the “pour-more-fuel-on-the-fire” strategy — troop surge. I guess McCain is arguing that’s a “new” strategy because they never tried undertaking any campaign in Iraq with sufficient troops. So much for “shock and awe.”
that can succeed. I was glad to walk through that market. I will go walk through a market as often as I can. It was not allowed to go through a market a short time before that.
MR. RUSSERT: But, senator, you had an armed escort.
SEN. McCAIN: I had an armed escort because, because that’s what General Petraeus thought we ought to have.
[Not because I really needed it. I’m not afraid o’ nobody’ nohow! Wicked Witch or no Wicked Witch, guards or no guards, I’ll tear them apart. I may not come out alive, but I’m going in there. I’ll show ‘em who’s king o’ duh forrest.]
I was glad to go outside of Baghdad and have over an hour opportunity to talk to the people that I talked to. Now, they are very different from the people that, that you are quoting here and others. They said, “I’m glad to see you. Things are better here. We have, we have seen improvement.” That’s what I was told, and that’s what the other two members of Congress were told when we were there. You can find a lot of difference of opinion if you want to, but I believe that it’s important for me to go out and meet those people if I can and be around them. I didn’t call for the kind of, quote, “protection” that was around me. But I am not afraid, and I’m glad to go any place that I can to talk to the people of Iraq and tell them of my commitment to see that they have a free, democratic government where they don’t have to face the bombs going off and the suicide bombers and the–and can start leading normal lives. And I’ll do that every chance I get.
[I’m willing to do everything to help Iraqis lead a normal life except end the American occupation that’s making them targets in the first place.]
MR. RUSSERT: But the military felt you needed that protection, and the number of suicide bombers has gone up since the surge began.
SEN. McCAIN: The military–the suicide bombers have gone up because they know that this is probably the most effective way publicitywise. It’s not the most effective way if you’re talking about winning a conflict. Suicide bombers are the most difficult of any to counter, people who are willing to take their own lives in order to take others’. You can ask the Israelis; I think they’ll tell you that. They have literally sealed their borders, and yet suicide bombers get across. And again, is this long and hard and difficult? Is that market safe? No, but it’s safer than it was before. And that, in my view, is the key to whether we will succeed or fail or not. And I’ll be glad to go back to that market with or without military protection and, and humvees, etc. But the fact is, I walked through narrow streets. I didn’t have people all around me. I don’t know what, what–where they get their information, but I was glad to walk around and talk to people and have contact with them and tell them that I, as an American, will do everything I can to let them lead the normal lives which are God-given rights to everybody on earth.
Yes, God-given rights. But our forefathers still put it in writing — the Bill of Rights — to make sure Americans could lead normal lives without government interference or infringement. And of course, Bush is ignoring that whole due process thing, even though that’s one of those both written and God-given rights that help people in America live a normal life. Oh wait a minute, we’re talking about people in Iraq. That’s right. McCain’s focused on preserving their God-given rights. Right. He’ll get around to that “spying on Americans” issue after he and his buddies deal with things in Iraq, in another 10 years, give or give. My bad again.
MR. RUSSERT: There seems to be a real erosion in support of the war amongst Republicans.
Ya think!
SEN. McCAIN: Yeah.
MR. RUSSERT: Eleven Republican congressmen met with the president. One said “My district is prepared for defeat if that’s what you are going to say, Mr. President.”
SEN. McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
MR. RUSSERT: The leader of the Republicans in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, “condemned the Iraqi government for its failure to resolve security and political problems more expeditiously and predicted that, unless the current troop surge succeeds, U.S. policy will be changed by year’s end either by” the president or by “congressional action.”
SEN. McCAIN: Well, first of all, I share his, his dismay, and we’ve discussed it already about the Iraqi government’s failure to act effectively. When I was over there, I met with Iraqi government officials and told them how important it is for them to act as a inclusive government, and, and I believe that they certainly are having messages sent. I hope that they are receiving them. And again, I understand the lack of patience on the part of the American people.
Lack of patience? After four years? That’s a little arrogant and unfair, Senata! Nope. Disgust is more like it. Disgust at an egotistical President with his own agenda and a do-nothing Republican Congress who let him get away with it for six years. Don’t marginalize how Americans are feeling, Senata! Kids are dying while you people avoid meaningful legislation with proposed Constitutional amendments on flag burning and gay marriages. Give me a serious break.
And we’re getting a little circular here in how sad and, and frustrated they are.
MR. RUSSERT: But these are the Republicans. They’re, they’re–Mitch McConnell’s saying that they’re ready to move this year, Republicans in Congress, against the war unless the surge shows success relatively quickly.
SEN. McCAIN: Look, I think, I think by the end of this year we will see some signs of success, how significant those will be. But if every Republican is against it, if every Republican calls for withdrawal, I will do what my conscience, my knowledge, my–I know what war is.
You knew what Vietnam was and you knew it as a POW for five years. You suffered and you own that. You are not a Middle East expert. You don’t have a pipeline to some special wisdom beyond the comprehension of other Republicans or the American people.
I know how evil these people are.
Which people? Iraqis? Aren’t they the one’s we’re trying to help? Evil is: any politician, world leader, clergy member, news organization, corporation, anthing or anyone using fear to manipulate the masses. That’s evil. And we’ve seen that in every country, in every capital, on every pulpit and street corner.
Remember these glowing moments from the 2004 GOP convention?
I know what war, war and peace is about. And I know the consequences, from my study of history and knowledge and background, the consequences of failure. So if I’m the last man standing, I have an obligation to do what my conscience and my knowledge and my background and everything I’ve known through my well-experienced life is best for this country. And I will not change from that, from that position. But I also understand what public opinion does and what democracies do. But that doesn’t mean that I change my views and my positions and blowing in the, in the direction of which the political winds are blowing.
So if you somehow make it to the White House, we’ll have another four to eight years of a U.S. Presidency that refuses to bow to the will of the American people. Democracy Inaction!
MR. RUSSERT: In 2000 you lost the Republican nomination to George Bush. Would it be ironic that you lost the 2000 [sic] nomination because you embraced George Bush’s Iraq war policy?
SEN. McCAIN: Life isn’t fair. I did not embrace the policy for a number of years. I was one of the severest critics. But life isn’t fair. But I–I’ve had a wonderful opportunity to serve this country. I have been the–I am the luckiest guy you will ever have on this program. I’ve been honored to serve. And I will continue to serve in some capacity until I am unable to do so.
“Life isn’t fair?” I’m sure countless Iraqis will agree — all those innocent people caught in between all that political chest thumping and all because they have the misfortune of sitting on a couple trillion barrels of crude oil. Yeah, life isn’t fair.
MR. RUSSERT: We’re going to take a quick break. We’re going to come back and talk to John McCain about other issues–immigration, taxes and more–right after this.
. . .
The rest of the transcript of Russert’s May 13, 2007 Meet the Press interview with Senator McCain can be found on MSNBC’s web site. It’s fairly informative about McCain’s position on a number of issues besides Iraq (yes, there are other issues). By all means, read on.